Meizu's counterattack? MX6 photo comparison evaluation

Camera MX6 this time equipped with Sony's latest custom IMX386 sensor, IMX386 can actually be seen as an upgraded version of IMX286, specifications for 12 million pixels, but the pixel 1.25um, 6P mirror, F/2.0 aperture, support phase focus. The specifications are still very strong. What is the actual performance?

Shooting contrast models we have found Meizu this year's flagship PRO6, Huawei P9 and millet 5, shooting proofs are closed HDR, auto focus and metering.

The shooting interface maintains the basic routine of Flyme5. Overall, it is very simple. Users can select the shooting mode by clicking in the lower left corner, and click on the upper right corner to set shooting parameters. However, in fact, many systems can adjust some common functions through gestures. , Such as through the left and right sliding mode switch, slide up and down into the professional camera mode, etc., compared to this set of MX6 can only talk about law-abiding, not easy to use but can be used.

Daytime proofs

In scene 1, it can be seen in the details of the high pixels of the millet 5 and PRO6 still account for a lot of advantages, you can see the font details are more abundant after zooming in, MX6 and P9 are a little confused compared.

In scene 2, it can be seen that the 4 mobile phones perform well in tolerance in high-contrast scenes. The details in both the sky and the shade are well balanced, except that Xiaomi 5 is too heavy in MSG. The real-life scene is very far apart (Huawei's HDR of P9 cannot be completely closed, so proofs will be more tolerant than normal models).

In the scene 3, 4 mobile phones are very good for the details of the macro, the petals of the veins and the details of the flower can be clearly seen, and the best performance in the color is MX6, flowers and green leaves are very good Restored, millet 5 and P9 colors are too saturated, PRO6 is quite satisfactory.

Low light during the night

Scene 4 can see that the best performance of the 4 groups of proofs is undoubtedly the P9. Whether it is the noise of the night sky, the processing of the light source or the details of the western building is better than the other three machines. The problem with the MX6 and PRO6 is that The smear is too heavy and the noise in the night sky is relatively touching. The details of the meter 5 are good, but the overall greening of the screen and the noise of the night sky are quite numerous.

In scene 5, it can be seen that millet 5 performs better under extreme low light, and is closer to the naked eye in terms of color. The details are also better than the other three mobile phones, especially when the pirate ship is enlarged. Out, P9 followed closely, mainly due to the color temperature is too dense to cause distortion, and MX6 and PRO6 performance is almost the same, smearing serious, the details of the loss is serious.

Scenario 6 The MX6's overall look and feel is the best among the drug testing samples. The brightest picture and chaotic color appearance are also very good. People's appetite is strong. The performance of the other three is not bad, but compared to it, it is too biased. The dark colors immediately give people no appetite.

to sum up

After comparing several sets of proofs, it can be seen that the MX6 performs very well during the day. Although there is a gap in the resolution of the MX6 from the models using the high-sensitivity imaging elements such as IMX298, it is in white balance, latitude, and color. Saturation and other aspects have performed very well, but after the night low light the overall strength of the MX6 will quickly decline, excessive smear makes the details lost, and after smear noise is not too good inhibition, so that the entire face of Feelings are very saddening. Fortunately, this problem will only appear under low light, and the performance under adequate light conditions at night is still acceptable. It can only be said that the adjustment of software on MX6 has maintained the overall level of PRO6. The conclusion is that the hardware quality is awesome and the software is weak.


Connector 2.5mm Pitch

Connector 2.5Mm Pitch,S11 Connectors,Welding Bar Connectors,Pressure Weld Bar Connector

YUEQING WEIMAI ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD , https://www.weimaiwafer.com