Which is better between t9900 and q9100? Talking about the difference between t9900 and q9100...

This article is mainly about the introduction of t9900 and q9100, and focuses on the performance parameters of t9900 and q9100.

t9900

On the afternoon of June 2, 2009, Intel shockedly released T9900. T9900 is the top processor of the T series, with a main frequency of 3.06G and a secondary cache of 6M. It is the highest frequency processor among the Core mobile processors. Even in 2011, three years later, the performance of the T9900 is still strong. After many media tests, the current mid-range I5 low-voltage processor is still difficult to beat the T9900 in other aspects except for the new hyper-threading technology. Intel’s wholesale price for 1,000 units is 530 US dollars.

Which is better between t9900 and q9100? Talking about the difference between t9900 and q9100

performance

Many players also find that T9900's processor overclocking capability is very powerful, and it is easy to exceed 3.5 on a laptop.

From the point of view of the parameters, the T9900 is exactly the same as the X9100 except for the TDP of 35W. You may have questions. Because T9900 wants to control TDP at 35W, it sacrifices a little bit of performance. After media testing, T9900 is about 2% lower than X9100, but due to power consumption issues, T9900 has wider availability.

Since it is the top processor of the T series for mobile platforms, the overclocking performance of T9900 is naturally also very powerful. Many players can easily overclock to 3.5.

Basic parameters

appropriate types

Notebook CPU

CPU series

CORE 2 DUO

manufacturer

Intel

CPU core

Number of transistors

410 million

Craftsmanship

45 nm

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

35W

Core area

107 square millimeters

Core type

Penryn

Number of cores

dual core

CPU frequency

Main frequency

3066MHz

Bus frequency

1066MHz

CPU socket

Slot type

Socket 478

Number of pins

478pin

CPU cache

128KB

Secondary cache

6MB

CPU technology

MMX, SSE (1.2.3S.4.1), EM64T, VT-x, etc.

Virtualization technology

Intel VT

Other parameters

Other properties

Support virus protection technology

Supports enhanced Intel Speedstep technology

Support Intel 64-bit technology

Compare

After reading the parameters of T9900, it is natural to think of the E8400 on the desktop. The main frequency of the E8400 is 3.0, the FSB is 333M, and the front-side bus is 1333M. What will be the result of the comparison between the two? ?

First of all, the notebook processor and the desktop processor are not completely equal. Even if the parameters of the two are completely equal, the notebook processor has to control power consumption, and the number of pins is not as much as that of the desktop, and the performance is not comparable to the desktop of the same grade. The CPU is very normal (even if it is the same notebook series X9100, the parameters are exactly the same as the T9900, and the performance is better than T9900, because X9100 does not control power consumption compared with T9900), so it is meaningless to compare the two, unless It is a super powerful notebook processor that can easily challenge the desktop, such as the extreme processor QX9300 of the Core 2 mobile platform, and you can easily challenge the Q6 series and Q8 series quad-core processors on the desktop. Win. Nevertheless, T9900 and E8400 are comparable in some aspects, such as higher main frequency, super π calculation, T9900 can run within 15S, E8400 basically can only linger at 15S or beyond.

The super π ran into the 15S, which is rare for the processors on the desktop. The current i5 is in the lead, but there are many i5s that can't run into the 15S, right?

In any case, T9900 is the top product of the T series after all (I dare to pack a ticket and there will be no T series that is more powerful than T9900, just look at the numbers, unless there is a so-called T9999 freak...) T9900 performance , Can not be questioned. Of course, the powerful processor has never gotten rid of the hat of high heat. T9900 and T6600 are both T series and the same 35W TDP. However, the heat of T9900 is larger than that of T6600. Players must remember: The higher the frequency of the processors of the same series, the greater the heat generation. Even if the TDP is the same, it cannot get rid of this law...

q9100

Important parameters

Production process: 45 nanometers

Secondary cache: 6MB*2

Core code: Yorkfield

Applicable type: desktop

Multiplier: 7 times

FSB: 333MHz

Intel Core 2 quad-core Q9100 (discrete) detailed parameters switch to the traditional table version

Basic parameters

Applicable type: desktop

CPU series: Core 2 quad-core Q9000

CPU frequency

CPU frequency: 2.33GHz

FSB: 333MHz

Multiplier: 7 times

Bus frequency: 1333MHz

CPU socket

Slot type: LGA 775

Number of pins: 775pin

CPU core

Core code: Yorkfield

Number of cores: four cores

Production process: 45 nanometers

CPU cache

Secondary cache: 6MB*2

Technical Parameters

Instruction set: MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE, SSE4.1, SE64T

Which is better, t9900 or q9100

a:

T9900 dual-core 3.06G 6M L2 cache 35w

Q9100 Quad-core 2.26G 12M L2 cache 45W

The front side bus is 1066

Multi-threaded Q9100 is better

But T9900 is generally used because the main frequency and high performance are better than Q9100, and it has less heat.

And because the Q9100 is quad-core, not all machines can light up

Conclusion

This is the end of the related introduction about t9900 and q9100. Please correct me if there are any deficiencies.

Related reading recommendations: What is the difference between a chip and a CPU?

Related reading recommendations: cpu internal structure micrograph/cpu internal structure enlarged view

PVC Rubber Key Chains

PVC keychain maker,pvc keychain manufacturers,pvc figural keychain,pvc keychain handmade,pvc keychain online

Shenzhen Konchang Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd , https://www.konchangs.com