Millet music as the mouth of the war of saliva

In the past two days, the hottest thing on the Internet is none other than Xiaomi Leshi's verbal battle. Today, Xiao Bian gave everyone a glimpse of what happened. On the afternoon of the 10th, Xiaomi held a media conference in Beijing to launch a brand new release on the content of Xiaomi's TV content. He pointed out that for the current shortage of TV content, Xiaomi used the trend of “Hai Na Bai Chuan” to integrate up to 100 contents inside and outside the industry. Vendors, including China Mobile, BesTV and Mango TV among the seven content providers authorized by the country, have invested billions of dollars to create a major video site, and are still content in Beijing. The notary office was notarized. Later on, LeTV made a long Weibo refutation against the notion that the notarized lie was still a lie. However, Xiaomi is not to be outdone. First of all, Xiaochuan Vice President Wang Chuan asked Jia Yueting on Weibo three questions: 1. Is LeTV a violation? 2. Does LeTV have less TV content than Xiaomi TV? 3. Does LeTV charge the annual fee? However, Jia Yueting has not responded to Wang Chuan’s question.

Then Xiaomi held a communication meeting on June 15th and invited securities, funds, and media personnel to help Jiayue Ting respond with Wang Chuan, and the war between the two was once again lit. LeTV, on the 16th, planned to implement the "extreme" mobile phone conference, using the last 20 minutes for content feedback. Questioning Wang Chuan on the first point: LeTV's broadcast control platform is suspected of violating the regulations and TV may be stopped at any time. Feng Xing responded: Xiaomi does not understand the law, or has ulterior motives and misleads the public. Wang Chuan questioned the second point: Xiaomi content is twice as much as LeTV, and free content is as high as %. Feng Xing responded: Xiaomi took others' content as his own, and he has become a joke. A lot of free content is a piece of flower, it's just a joke. Wang Chuan queried the third point: LeEng bundled the annual fee and asked the user to continue the renewal as a scam. Feng Xing responded: LeTV's “hardware price + service fee price = hardware production cost (annual fee is a gift), after the service expires, Users can choose whether or not to renew their fees. If they do not renew their fees, they can still enjoy as much content and services as their friends. Is this a scam?

After LeTV responded, Xiaomi TV once again responded to LeTV's three-point response. In response to the first question, Xiaomi TV responded that LeTV acknowledged that it had been violating the sale of TV so far, but was still evasive and not adequate for users and investors. Disclosure of risk. In response to the second question, Xiaomi TV responded that LeTV has admitted that we have more content than them, but LeTV is still confusing. LeTV's remarks seriously affected the user’s perception of Xiaomi’s television content advantages and damaged the reputation of Xiaomi TV. This violated the law of unfair competition and disparaged Xiaomi’s goodwill. Xiaomi retained the right to prosecute LeTV. Regarding the third question, Xiaomi TV responded that: The free content of Xiaomi TV is more than the content of LeTV. The clarity is also better. How can it be the same? Is this not a scam?

In addition to the torturing of products, there have been criticisms on LeTV Jia Yueting’s reduction of stocks, but this is not the scope of our digital circle discussion.

Xiao Bian felt that the statistics on the number of millet should be true, and it was unlikely that the notary office openly falsified. However, Internet TV can integrate various resources to facilitate the unified viewing of netizens. This is the case for home appliance companies such as Hisense, TCL, and so on. Ah, video copyrights belong to various copyright parties. TV companies want to cooperate, but they are not so difficult. One thing, Xiaomi can do, Hisense can do it, TCL can do it, and LeTV can actually do it, basically without too much barriers. According to Xiao Bian, the uniqueness of LeTV is its exclusive sports resources that have operated for many years. NBA, Premier League, and F1. The live streaming of these events is an important reason for consumers to purchase and pay, at least for Xiaobian. Is such that. Do not say anything else, single English, is enough.

Xiaomi said LeTV broadcast violations, LeTV also admitted. However, Xiao Bian wants to say is this regulation itself is not reasonable? The core of the Internet is openness, inclusiveness, and the need to use various rules and regulations to put the enterprises in it into the mix. Whether or not the rules themselves are reasonable is the majority of consumers. Everyone who buys Internet TV should think about it. Just as the current hot car illegally violates the law and prevents users from gaining convenience, what is the special car or the rule?